香港新浪網MySinaBlog 精選話題工具
« 上一篇 | 下一篇 »
經綸 | 18th Jan 2008 | 經綸天下

Picture

In the export surplus countries – especially China -- and Gulf States flushed with revenues from selling hydrocarbons, massive foreign currency reserve is accumulating. Sovereign Wealth Funds were set up to take care of the gigantic wealth. And these funds are looking forward to go shopping for quality overseas companies. Their purchases of stakes in major financial institutions in the US topped the headlines and lead stories in prominent newspapers recently. To name a few of them, China Investment Corporations, Kuwait Investment Authority, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Qatar Investment Authority are among the frontrunners. 

To avoid political backfire, these new investors are exceptionally low-key in their purchases. Although the way they loosen their purse string with multibillions of dollars pouring towards the troubled western banks and dealers was impressive, they were very restrained from making any assertive comments on these investments. Indeed, most of these purchases were in form of buying preferential shares and alike. And they did not seek influence in the management of the invested. 

If I were the consigliere of these sovereign wealth funds, I would be rather conservative in the way the reserves are deployed knowing that – especially for China – every buck and dime was earned with blood and sweats of the impoverished labors. The future of the financial institutes is far from clear at this moment. While devastating writedowns had blemished the fame of those prestigious golden brands, it is quite obvious that some dead bodies are still hidden. Nobody has full idea how far had the “creative” financial alchemy taken us to, and thus no idea of how far the downward spiral can take us to in the coming days. It is doubtful whether these financiers at the current price level are really a bargain. 

The SWFs did not seek controlling stakes in the invested companies or even to nominate directors mainly due to the political concerns. At the same time, as Henny Sender observed, these funds managed by their own managers have only embryonic establishment, unlike some of their older peers like the GIC. They are perfect rookies to investing in financial companies. Investing in these financials without sophisticated establishment to oversee is practically giving money out to be managed by foreigners. They can well remain silent about their investments as they are not accountable to the public. They answer directly to the royal families, emirates or unelected governments. But it is far from satisfactory to kickoff their warehouse building by such large purchases of risky stakes. 

Instead of funding the troubled financial institutes, there are lots of opportunities for investment around the neighboring emerging economies. While the western financiers are mostly looking east for investment opportunities, it seems quite absurd to invest into these companies so that they can invest back to our own markets. Unless you totally distrust the ability of the locals in making intelligent investment decisions, I do not see any point to outsource this investment job to those who are still struggling out from the murky swamp of subprime crisis. 

Instead of investing in overseas financials, the deployment of the funds should have a clearer focus to facilitate domestic economic development. Let’s take China as an example. There are two major needs for the Chinese economy to continue developing.  

Firstly, as a manufacturing giant, the country had swallowed a significant portion of the world supply of natural resources. It is a top-priority strategic need to secure enough natural resources to keep the giant dragon from thirst of oil or hungry of metals. While SOEs like CNOOC and PetroChina are seeking overseas acquisitions, injection of capital into these companies can certainly equip them better to compete with other multinational bidders. 

Secondly, the Chinese market was predominantly controlled by State-owned Enterprises (SOEs) which had just recently begun to reform for more efficiency. Private enterprises, on the other hand, were growing and yet remained small in global scale. The small manufacturers had poor records of compliance to international standards for labor and environmental protection, which had created deadlocked problems to the society. To upgrade the enterprises to meet challenges from their multinational competitors and to solve the social and environmental problems, it is obvious that the mammoth SOEs and under-scale private enterprises are going to go through a consolidation process. The challenges are imminent and the government should play a bigger role in meeting them. And the growing foreign currency reserve is an important tool for the government to perform such a role. 

The performances of the newly established SWFs characterized mainly by injecting funds into the troubled western financial institutes are far from satisfactory. And the role of remaining a silent investor should not be a long-term goal of the sovereign fund managers. There is still a long way to go before these SWFs to find a fitting role to play in the world economy.


[1]

Your argument is very convincing but I hardly share your view that the government shall interfere the consolidation of industries and enterprises with the wealth of her countrymen at an expense of market freedom and interruption of privitization, which the government has spent a lot of effort in law making, policy making and rectification of the theory of Chinese Socialism in recent decade.

長空無二
[引用] | 作者 長空無二 | 20th Jan 2008 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[2] RE: 長空無二

In a globalized economy, competitions are in global scale. Governments of the developing states are merely among the league of market players and certainly not the mightiest. They can have advantages in the domestic markets because they hold the reins of regulations and macro-management measures. They can use domestic economic policies to alter the domestic market conditions to a certain extent. However, their power of policy formulation in global level is negligible. Indeed, with increasing supranational regulatory bodies’ intrusion into domestic policy making, the power of the states to alter their domestic markets is also diminishing.

With a capitalization of USD2500b, the SWFs collectively seem to be quite significant a category of players in the global market. Nevertheless, these funds have very diversified objectives and interests to serve. Their targets for acquisitions or portfolio investments are also much diversified. It is in doubt whether these funds are really that significant in global scale separately. They may just be another big corporation considering their scale. And most importantly, they are simply going to follow the global market regulations, not shaping them. They can hardly even influence the regulatory regimes in the overseas and global markets.

I support the idea for better utilization of the foreign currency reserve of the developing countries mainly because these sources can provide a rare chance for these states to compete with the developed world more directly, capacitate them to rival the giant MNCs which had long dominated the global market, especially for natural resources.

Even if the developing countries fully utilize what is in their vaults now, it still has very limited bargaining power and thus can afford to serve only a limited agenda. I am not even so worried that their involvement in domestic markets is really going to significantly alter the shape of privatization and consolidation of domestic enterprises. The domestic markets of these developing countries are opening up rapidly and the consolidation processes are hardly catching up. When the entry barriers for foreign mega-conglomerates are uplifted, under scale companies are going to be swallowed easily and the domestic markets will be lost quickly.

I am not so optimistic that even with the assistance of the SWFs the consolidation can progress quickly enough to groom globally competitive local enterprises before the fateful opening up. And far less am I concerned about the impact of losing of market freedom because it may well not be a market for the locals.

The Consigliere
[引用] | 作者 The Consigliere | 20th Jan 2008 | [舉報垃圾留言]